You are in the Quick tips & recommended category.

We’re in 2006 guys not 199x!

Just recently, I have come across *so* many inaccessible and invalid websites that I just had to write about it. I am shocked and totally disappointed. Maybe I shouldn’t be, but to be honest I am… I really am. In particular, the ones that get my goat are the web companies that are shouting things like “latest in web design technology? “with built-in accessibility? “usability best practice?. I am so disappointed. I hope I just had a bad week of viewing source code too many times and it just so happened to be the bad ones. So many code-bloated, table-based, html 4 (some with no doc type at all) websites. Tut tut… :(

Instead of repeating and ranting on about what so many people have already said a million times, I’ll make this short and sweet. I am going to add a few links here which explain web standards and why we, the developer and you, the customer, should be doing it and demanding it respectively.

For people who build websites – The developer

Why tables for layout is stupid: problems defined, solutions offered
www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
What Every Web Site Owner Should Know About Standards: A Web Standards Primer
www.maccaws.org/kit/primer/
Design rant
www.thenoodleincident.com/tutorials/design_rant/
The need for accessibility
www.webnauts.net/accessibility-need.html
An Interview With Douglas Bowman of Wired News
devedge-temp.mozilla.org/viewsource/2002/wired-interview/
CSS examples - FAQ. (From Paul O Brien, CSS guru.)
www.pmob.co.uk/faqcss/

For people who want a website – The customer

PAS 78 Guide to Good Practice in Commissioning Accessible Websites
www.bsi-global.com/ICT/PAS78/index.xalter
The need for accessibility
www.webnauts.net/accessibility-need.html
Why tables for layout is stupid: problems defined, solutions offered
www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
BBC - New standards for website access
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4783686.stm

I hope this helps some folks out there. :)

Posted in Quick tips & recommended on October 17th, 2006 - 6 comments

Tags: , , ,

6 comments to “We’re in 2006 guys not 199x!”

  1. Simon Clayson Says... October 18th, 2006 at 8:14 am

    You’re banging your head against a brick wall. Most people don’t care - even the ones who do - make sense? Just keep on about it though and do yourself justice.

  2. Hudson Says... October 18th, 2006 at 3:48 pm

    Might I just add Paul Boag’s recent Podcast “The Benefits of Web Standards” to that list. Definitely essential viewing.

    I’ve just started a new job where the current site is painfully crap in terms of design and code, so I’m hunting around for as many sites, articles and so forth which I can use to back up my case for a complete redesign and recode! How geek am I?!

    Anyway, hello there Laura, I believe you were at uni with a friend of mine (Phil Hemmings) so I just thought I’d drop by and say hi.

  3. Hudson Says... October 18th, 2006 at 3:53 pm

    …of course it might help if I get my links right…

    The benefits of Web Standards by Paul Boag

    and I call myself a web designer….*tut*

  4. Laura Zucchetti Says... October 20th, 2006 at 6:26 am

    Oh, thanks Hudson. I shall take a peek at that link on my lunch today. :)

  5. Zorba Says... October 23rd, 2006 at 11:32 am

    Go on Laura name & shame… (As long as it’s not one of mine :)

  6. Laura Zucchetti Says... October 24th, 2006 at 11:24 am

    :P Oh it was so tempting….

Join the conversation here...

You can use these html tags when making a comment:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <strong> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike>

Back to the top